Compared with what Jesus said in John 3:16 (which I realized today), Rev 3:16
sounds like a hard saying that was not likely to come out from the
mouth of a loving God who loves us while we are yet sinners - John 3:16
KJV For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting
life.
Hence, I can understand why many 'grace' preachers made a
big fuss of it on all the hard sayings of Jesus which they find it hard
to make sense in the 'gospel' that they preach. They would just brush
off all the hard sayings of the Lord as obsolete teachings not
applicable to them who are under the new covenant.
While I do
understand the concern of the ignorant preachers or believers who will
take the hard sayings of the Lord so negatively that they find it
hopeless to believe in the Lord any more, I find it ridiculous to use
that as the basis (or excuse) to eliminate (or discredit) all the hard
sayings of Lord as obsolete (or useless) teachings for us.
Please
think, Will you say that the laws of our country against the cheaters,
the rapers, or the robbers, are 'hard sayings' for the people too? Will
you say that the criminal laws have become obsolete because our society
or our churches are too righteous to have those laws? No. If those laws
are still applicable in our society or churches, how much more
applicable would the laws of God be in our imperfect world or imperfect
churches too?
Of course, we don't want our children or teach our
children to be rapers or robbers and we won't expect our children or
ourselves to be rapers or robbers too; however, we won't go around and
say that the laws are no longer applicable to us.
Similarly we do not
want our believers and teach our believers to be lukewarm too; however,
we would never preach that the Lord's warning against the lukewarm
people are no longer applicable to us, especially when the Lord had
shown us that almost all the seven churches were seriously warned by Him
in Revelation 2-3.
However, it is sad to know that many
so-called positive 'grace' preachers today would want to paint only the
positive picture of the Revelation's churches to the people, saying that
their churches or most churches today would never be condemned as the
lukewarm people; instead they say that they would be praised as the
great churches who will shine from glory to glory. Of course, I do not
deny that there are churches who may grow from glory to glory, but we do
not have to boast about it blindly or radically, especially when many
churches today are still living short of the glory of God and still
walking in the blindness or nakedness created by their false doctrine.
Many churches will still need the 'wake up' call.
Of course, no
one would like to give or preach warnings if there is a choice; it is
stressful and negative to everyone. However, when there is urgency, do
we have a choice? Of course, no one would enjoy activating the tsunami
alarm to create the stressful scene too. But when someone knows that
there will be a great earthquake and that there is a high possibility
that the tsunami will be coming, does he have the choice to keep quiet
and do nothing? No, he must do something if he is responsible to those
who are around him.
Similarly the hard sayings of the Lord in Mat
7:15-23 and Rev 3:16 are like the tsunami warnings. They are serious
enough for us to warn others even though we know that it will make many
people stressful and unhappy. But, if we choose to say nothing, we are
no better than the 'lukewarm' in Rev 3. The Lord has warned us that many
false prophets will rise in the last days. They will keep arguing that
they do not need any warning from the Lord and that they can never be
the 'lukewarm', when ironically they are the most likely lukewarm that
the Lord will spue out from His mouth.
We know that the Pharisees
had the form of laws and godliness; and yet they fell. What make us
think that the lukewarm preachers would not have the form of the law,
the form of grace, or the form of godliness too? In fact, Paul had
warned us that there is a 'form of grace' which can never save too? -
the perverted grace:
Heb 10:26-31 KJV For if we sin wilfully after
that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no
more sacrifice for sins, .. (28) He that despised Moses' law died
without mercy under two or three witnesses: (29) Of how much sorer
punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden
under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant,
wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto
the Spirit of grace? (30) For we know him that hath said, Vengeance
belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The
Lord shall judge his people. (31) It is a fearful thing to fall into
the hands of the living God.
2Ti 3:5 KJV Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
Since I have shown you some questions about 'godliness', which I've started with Rev 3:16 and John 3:16, I will now complete it with more answers about 'godliness' with the following Bible verses:
1Ti 3:16
KJV And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was
manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels,
preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into
glory. (Please read it with the previous verse too (v15) ".. that thou
mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God .."
2Ti 3:16-17
KJV All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable
for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
righteousness: (17) That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
::
No comments:
Post a Comment