If
you have read my previous post K099, you will know the answer. Of
course, Jesus would still tell the churches or believers to confess
their sins. If Jesus had taught and told all His disciples to confess
their sins in Luk 11:4 and commanded the churches in Rev 2-3 to repent,
He would still tell the churches today to confess their sins too.
However,
many churches today still argue that they can never sin, and therefore
they would never need to confess (or tell their believers to confess)
any sin. When they say so, they are trying to preach that Rev 2-3 and
the warnings of the Lord are not applicable to us. If they can convince
us, they will go further and conclude that all the warnings, the words,
the commands, the principles, and the doctrine of Christ are not
applicable to us too (because they can now listen to the 'gospel that
Paul preached'). They will just conveniently say that all the doctrine
and commands of Jesus are hard sayings which were applicable only to the
Pharisees or those who were under the law. But I find it hard to accept
their ridiculous excuses or false teaching.
The Bible has clearly taught the believers to confess sins; not prosperity, righteousness, or 'positive' desires
Today
many who argued vehemently against the confession of sins may still
change their minds. They may say that they do not mind if people confess
or not confess their sins. But, they would still insist that confession
of sins is only for the agnostic believers; not for other believers.
They would argue, "What's the big deal if we confess or do not confess
our sins? However, we would rather confess righteousness! If we confess
righteousness, we will see more benefits; but if we confess sins, we
receive only reminder of our sins, and subsequently, more condemnation
of sins .."
I will tell them, Yeah, it's no big deal for you; but, it
is a big deal for us. It is because Jesus, John the Baptist, and John
the disciple had all taught and said it clearly that we should confess
sins. If all of them had told us to confess sins, it would be a big deal
if we try to preach otherwise. If you said that it is no big deal for
you to confess sins, why do you make it a big deal to confess
righteousness (500 times or 5000 times to get more health or wealth)?
Obviously 'confession of righteousness to get things' is just what you
think. Paul had never said that we should confess righteousness to get
more things or better things. Yes, he did say that we are made righteous
in Christ; but he DID NOT SAY that we CONFESS it to be more righteous
or to prosper more in heath or wealth: 1Co 1:30 KJV But of him are ye
in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness,
and sanctification, and redemption.
Yes, John may tell us to prosper
in health (3Jn 1:2); but he DID NOT SAY that we should CONFESS it to
prosper in health and wealth too.
The believers do not confess sins to get 'things'
Hence,
if we must confess something, we must make sure that we confess it
according to God's words; not according to men's words or men's
thinking. If we confess it, we must confess it only because God said it; not because we think that God said it (based on our own interpretation or understanding).
Many
of us think that we must confess sins to get something too (to get
righteousness of God, forgiveness of our sins, or prosperity). But, I
realise that while a sinners may confess sins to get all those things; a
believer do not confess sins to get 'things'. Actually I did ask God:
"If the believer do not confess sin to get forgiveness or things, it
should be no big deal for us to confess sin or not to confess sin? Why
would the Lord or John still teach the disciples or the believers to
confess sins?" I did not get the answer initially. I could not answer
the lawless preachers who proposed that we should just confess
righteousness instead of sins. They said, "We understand that the
sinners should confess sins to get forgiveness of their sins; but we are
now righteous, why do we still confess sins ?"
Why would the believers still need to confess sins?
But
I can now answer them. I woke up this morning with the answer. That
feeling was like 'having my ears totally blocked by something unknown
for many many years; but that blockage suddenly disappears and I can now
hear and think more clearly than before, even before my ears were
blocked'.
The answer is already in the Bible; but we could have been
too blinded to see it. The Bible has actually explained why the
disciples and believers will still confess their sins even though they
have been made righteous (or would be made righteous). The sinners may
confess sins because of one reason, ie. to show that they will now
repent, turn from their lawlessness, and turn to God; but, the believers
confess sins because of more than one reason. I can now show three
reasons, all of which can be confirmed or seen clearly in the whole
gospel or the Bible.
Jesus wants us (THE BELIEVERS):
1. to remember that we ourselves are the sinners too, and therefore we ought to forgive other sinners (Luke 11:4)
2. not to think highly
of ourselves and behave like Pharisees who prayed in Luk 18:14 or like
Peter who became over-confident and boastful in Mat 26:33
3. to be honest about our sins and repent like the prodigal son in Luk 15:17-19, especially if we have wronged others or sin against God.
Many
of us think that the parable of the prodigal son is about two types of
people: 1. the sinners and 2. the believers. However, it could be two
types of BELIEVERS too: 1. the believers who fell and came back to God,
and 2. the believers who did not sin but became ungracious and
unforgiving. The first group of believers would confess their sins
because they know that they have sinned and that they could still fall
and sin; but the second group would think that they could never sin. The
second group could have forgotten that they were sinners too. If they
could still remember the Lord's prayer in Luk 11:4 and pray, they would
confess their sins too, and humble themselves and accept those who have
repented and come back to God.
All the believers or sinners in the world must still confess sins
Many
of us (the believers) may not behave or sin like the prodigal son or
Zacchaeus. Hence, we may not confess our sins or repent like them. But,
if Jesus has shown us that we should all repent and confess our sins for
any one of the three reasons above, none of us can boast and say that
we are too righteous to confess any sin, too anointed to pray any
confession of sins, or too smart to be convicted of any sins.
Of
course, we do not deny that grace and the forgiveness of God is greater
than our sins; but it is still not great enough to exempt the sinners,
the believers, and the churches in the world from confessing their sins,
from praying, and from the conviction of the Holy Spirit too.
Joh
16:7-8 KJV Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you
that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto
you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. (8) And when he is
come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
Confession of sins may be a practice under the law; but it can be a practice under grace too
Many
preachers will still argue, "But confession of sins is an Old Testament
practice. The Old Testament prophets would always tell the people to
confess their sins; but we are in the New Testament. After the death of
John the Baptist and Jesus Christ, whatever they said, confessed,
preached, or practised (including the confession of sins) have become
obsolete teachings. Their doctrine is now replaced by the gospel of
grace or the gospel that Paul preached - which do not have any
confession of sins in true repentance."
Mat 3:4-6 KJV And the same
John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his
loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey. (5) Then went out to
him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan,
(6) And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.
I
will tell them, Yes, both John the Baptist and Jesus Christ did preach
confession of sins which could have been an Old Testament practice;
however, what they preached (ie. water baptism) with the confession of
sins is not an Old Testament teaching: The Jews would confess their sins
with the offering of their animal sacrifice; whilst the believers today
would still confess their sins with the water baptism.
Of course, we
must view both the animal sacrifice and water baptism as just a
ceremony, a practice, or an outward confession of our sins; but what is
more important is the inner confession which cannot be seen. However, if
we would still practise water baptism or the outward confession of our
sins, it is still a valid practise in the New Testament. Why? It is
still necessary for the churches and us to remember
1. that we are the sinners, and we ought to humble ourselves and forgive others too (Luk 11:4).
2. that it is the grace of God to allow us to repent and to be baptised
That's why we can say that water baptism and confession of sins is 'grace practice' and it is still under the New Covenant.
Like the law of God, confession of sins cannot be obsolete
It
is certainly a weak argument to say that confession of sins,
worshipping God, and keeping of God's commandments are all Old Testament
practice, and therefore they are no longer necessary in the New
Testament today. Yes, we cannot deny that all the Jews confessed their
sins, worshipped God, and obeyed God's commandments (and they did all
these under the law); however, we, the believers, would still confess
our sins, worship God, and keep God's commandments (under grace) too.
The difference is in the way we do it:
1. Confession of sins -
In the Old Testament, the Jews would confess their sins with the
offering of their animal sacrifice or the wearing of sackcloth and
ashes; but in the New Testament, we confess our sins in our prayer and
in our closets (Luk 11:4). But we would still offer fruit of repentance
by showing it with our lives (Act 26:20). We may still practise water
baptism publicly to show our will, determination, and testimony to turn
away from sin, but we must do it with a true heart of repentance (1 John
1:9).
2. Worshipping God - In the Old Testament, the Jews
would worship God in the temple; but we worship God in spirit and in
truth (Joh 4:23-24, Php 3:3). We do not just love God, we worship God.
If we worship God, we will keep His commandments and love our neighbour
too (Luk 10:28, 36-37).
3. Keeping God's commandments - In the
Old Testament, the Jews would keep God's commandments written on the
stones or on the scrolls; but in the New Testament, we are taught to
keep God's commandments in our hearts through Christ (Heb 8:10, 10:16).
We do not keep the law of Moses or circumcision; we keep the law of
Christ and the law of the Spirit (Rom 8:2). If we keep the law of the
Spirit, we keep the law of God (Of course, the law of the Spirit and the
law of God are the same; will anyone dispute it ?) If we keep the law
of God, we will obey it and do it too. We will also do all that the
Spirit of God say to us; not just one commandment or ten commandments -
this is the (real) New Covenant:
Rom 8:2-8 KJV For the law of the
Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and
death. .. (7) Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is
not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. (8) So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.
::
No comments:
Post a Comment